Gigabyte AB350M-DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive6.49% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte AB350M-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '19 at 21:33
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 173
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 573
56% 457 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1295 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.5% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 69.8
48% 62.5 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 53
48% 58.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 2.6 7.8 41 23 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
6.49% Terrible
Read 38
Write 46
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 25.3
7% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 0.7
6% 3.43 MB/s
DQ Read 62.2
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 16.7
17% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 6.49%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
64GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 54 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 48.8
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 56.2
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 23.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte AB350M-DS3H - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback