IBM 3850 M2 / x3950 M2 -[7141W9S]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemIBM 3850 M2 / x3950 M2 -[7141W9S]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM Node1 Processor Card
Memory30 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.5 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20101221
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '16 at 07:15
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7320
Node 1 CPU 3, 4 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
Memory 45.6
1-Core 24.6
2-Core 49.5
26% 39.9 Pts
4-Core 99
8-Core 198
18% 148 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID-MR10k 999GB
908GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.40
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.8% Excellent
Read 700
Write 381
Mixed 507
117% 529 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 19.1
94% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 83.7
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 42.7
43% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 94%
IBM ServeRAID-MR10k 639GB
595GB free
Firmware: 1.40
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.3% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 69.5
Mixed 69.9
50% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.11
30% 0.24 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 32 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 12.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 1.1
5% 1.7 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback