Asus PRIME B350M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350M-A  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '19 at 17:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 210
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 441
58% 435 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 19.4
12% 16.7 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 18.8
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 2.5 7MM 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4152012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 97 100 93 102 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 487
Write 319
Mixed 303
SusWrite 103
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 43.2
148% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 231
192% 280 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
316GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 119 120 122 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 126
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 120
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 31.4
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 24.2
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350M-A Builds (Compare 2,132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback