Asus PRIME B350M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350M-A  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '19 at 14:13
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 200
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 437
53% 406 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 19.6
12% 16.8 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 0.09
7% 9.55 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 2.5 7MM 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4152012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 98 93 96 98 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 484
Write 316
Mixed 327
SusWrite 110
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 37.2
138% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 231
192% 277 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
407GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 127 128 127 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 125
Write 119
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 127
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 31.5
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 24.8
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350M-A Builds (Compare 2,133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback