Samsung R430/R480/R440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung R430/R480/R440  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R430/R480/R440
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100525
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 29 '16 at 20:47
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 56
2-Core 112
46% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 143
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C551) 730MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.85
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.89 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 70.5
Mixed 66.9
52% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.08
39% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5428-011.A01LF 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R430/R480/R440 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R430/R480/R440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback