Lenovo 20HES0FA3J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20HES0FA3J  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HES0FA3J
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 09:40
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 166
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 288
40% 294 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 2245) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6344
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 7.22
6% 8.53 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 14
9% 10 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0B-00YS70 2TB
823GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 382 382 375 376 411 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 452
Write 410
Mixed 331
SusWrite 384
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 29
99% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 50.1
DQ Mixed 261
135% 112 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMSA3300MH78HBF-2666 Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 24.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22.5
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback