Lenovo 20HES0FA3J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20HES0FA3J  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HES0FA3J
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 09:34
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 162
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 254
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 2245) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6344
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 9.85
Parallax 6.72
6% 7.99 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 13.2
8% 9.49 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0B-00YS70 2TB
822GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 357 358 322 357 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 293
Write 249
Mixed 257
SusWrite 351
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 20.9
63% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 85.6
87% 138 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMSA3300MH78HBF-2666 Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.3% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 22.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 19
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback