ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S5

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S5 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2709
Memory	20.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130204
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '19 at 19:45
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570 2,341 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 84 2-Core 168 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 471 50% 396 Pts	64-Core 801 50% 801 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 70 Reflection 67.4 Parallax 83.2 57% 73.5 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 68.2 Splatting 55.5 51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 214 218 216 217 217 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.9% Above average	Read 214 Write 188 Mixed 176 SusWrite 215 45% 198 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 30.9 109% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 37.5 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 47.6 45% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 119%
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 60GB-$45 164 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 47GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 117 108 111 114 105 MB/s Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.3% Above average	Read 280 Write 127 Mixed 169 SusWrite 110 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 29.3 107% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 108 85% 118 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 76%
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB 5,922 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 77GB free Firmware: DXM06H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 221 218 176 217 217 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.2% Above average	Read 192 Write 147 Mixed 176 SusWrite 212 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 31.1 107% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 36.2 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 47.7 43% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 18 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 20 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 10.7 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback