Today's hottest deals

Asus GL502VS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL502VS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL502VS
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 15:31
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 151
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 544
49% 414 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23
Parallax 58.2
16% 33.7 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 63.4
Splatting 75.4
57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512G39MND-3510A 512GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20400P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 295 282 261 261 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 391
Write 386
Mixed 328
SusWrite 283
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 12.1
58% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 291
227% 313 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 100%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
906GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 121 120 121 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 125
Write 120
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 121
71% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1315 CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.6% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL502VS Builds (Compare 438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL502VS - $1,607

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,607
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback