Samsung RC530/RC730

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung RC530/RC730  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RC530/RC730
Memory1.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110927
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 14:30
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 88
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 117
59% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 115
21% 144 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Sanyo(144D C0C1) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 1.72
3% 3.13 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.03
Splatting 2.91
3% 4.22 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 373 392 393 400 397 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 428
Write 416
Mixed 262
SusWrite 386
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 28.8
94% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 257
202% 281 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83%
Great: 119%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
55GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.43% Terrible
Read 32.5
Write 28.7
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 29.7
7% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 6
20% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 9.43%
Great: 119%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
57GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 13 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 18
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 13
23% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.5
119% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 40%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
930GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
9.59% Terrible
Read 28.7
Write 22.2
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 18.5
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.59%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10.8
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RC530/RC730 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RC530/RC730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $253
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $119Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback