Samsung RC530/RC730

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung RC530/RC730  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RC530/RC730
Memory1.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110927
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 09:38
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 102
50% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 150
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Sanyo(144D C0C1) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 1.72
3% 3.13 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 2.91
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 408 404 409 396 406 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 445
Write 418
Mixed 331
SusWrite 406
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 27.5
91% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 279
219% 306 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 119%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.37% Terrible
Read 33.7
Write 26.5
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 18
6% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 5.1
19% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 119%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
54GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 26
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 16.8
30% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.3
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RC530/RC730 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RC530/RC730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback