Asus P8Z68-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 13:43
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.5% Very good
SC Int 121
SC Float 122
SC Mixed 120
97% 121 Pts
QC Int 358
QC Float 359
QC Mixed 359
81% 359 Pts
MC Int 360
MC Float 358
MC Mixed 360
54% 359 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550 Ti-$250
Zotac(19DA 5194) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1100 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 355.82
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 36.9
Reflection 37.5
Parallax 33.2
11% 35.9 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 38
16% 37.7 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 13%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$90
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 20 25 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.3% Good
Read 282
Write 200
Mixed 240
SusWrite 31.6
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 36.3
125% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 127
127% 211 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 118%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
86GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 65 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 89.8
Write 87.3
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 65.5
57% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 100%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$160
101GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 112 112 110 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 92
Write 92.8
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 112
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 69%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$97
115GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 87 89 107 122 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 119
Write 116
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 104
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 89%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
99GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 101 87 69 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 101
Write 99.7
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 93.1
124% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
63.1% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 55.4
72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P8Z68-V Builds (Compare 2,194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $996
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback