Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2 DDR3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2 DDR3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2 DDR3-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 19:15
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 80.6
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 742
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 749
46% 749 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 36E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1774 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 64.2
57% 68.1 fps
MRender 74.3
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 60.1
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 120GB
6GB free
Firmware: 1.3.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 69 72 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.6% Average
Read 152
Write 93.3
Mixed 116
SusWrite 73.2
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 17.8
111% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 111
87% 120 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 101%
Corsair Force 128GB
59GB free
Firmware: 5.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 180 184 182 180 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 308
Write 247
Mixed 250
SusWrite 179
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 41.9
172% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 148
134% 202 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 153 153 136 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 6.5
Write 99.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 144
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.2
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 859B CT102464BA160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2 DDR3-CF Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2 DDR3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $294
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback