Mousecomputer/7hpr64 H87M-S01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMousecomputer/7hpr64 H87M-S01  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer H87M-S01
Memory15.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130708
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 06:37
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 215
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 588
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.72
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 36.7
29% 32.9 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 33.6
29% 35.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 234 216 188 184 190 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 481
Write 270
Mixed 240
SusWrite 210
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 26.6
103% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 75.6
DQ Mixed 139
114% 169 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
602GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 99
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 87.4
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 64 64 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 58.6
Write 59.2
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 63.3
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST9640320AS 640GB-$270
522GB free
Firmware: 0004SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 84 85 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 42.2
Write 46.4
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 85
37% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 49%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
756GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 50 49 53 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 32.8
Mixed 46
SusWrite 48.7
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 68%
Generic External 250GB
232GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 82 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 83.2
Write 80.1
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 82.7
95% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 156%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX16GX3M2A1600C11 0420 DDR3 1600G Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.1% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-S01 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Mousecomputer/7hpr64 H87M-S01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback