bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DZ68BC
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 23:41
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81% Excellent
SC Int 119
SC Float 119
SC Mixed 119
82% 119 Pts
QC Int 472
QC Float 475
QC Mixed 464
84% 471 Pts
MC Int 464
MC Float 464
MC Mixed 478
32% 469 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 8390) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Lighting 65
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 62
20% 64.4 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 53.7
26% 60.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 24%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 332ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 116 116 113 115 110 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.1% Average
Read 247
Write 107
Mixed 134
SusWrite 110
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 25.4
83% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 40.6
DQ Mixed 28.3
23% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 83%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
11GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.4 5.3 6 5.5 5.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
9.45% Terrible
Read 34.8
Write 6
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5.6
12% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
76% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.45%
Great: 15%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
5GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 6 8.4 8 9.8 9.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 8.2
14% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
78% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.3
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical bin Builds (Compare 40,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $560
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $248Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback