bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DZ68BC
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 00:48
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 96.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 465
62% 463 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 8390) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 18.2
17% 21 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 22
19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 332ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 118 120 117 118 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.6% Average
Read 245
Write 107
Mixed 142
SusWrite 113
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 24.8
85% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 42
DQ Mixed 27.6
23% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 81%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
11GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 5.1 5.6 5.7 5.3 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Read 34.6
Write 6.3
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.7
14% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 2
98% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
5GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.1 8.6 8 8.4 8.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
7.63% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 6.5
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 8.3
16% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
47% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.63%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback