Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 18:44
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 804
73% 616 Pts
64-Core 1,115
69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
56.4% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 65.6
56% 67.9 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 69.8
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 519 327 314 313 316 317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 2,266
Write 1,456
Mixed 1,198
SusWrite 351
292% 1,318 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 55.3
181% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 439
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 397
290% 381 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 185%
Great: 280%
Adata SU650 960GB
823GB free
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 420 436 428 429 435 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 445
Mixed 400
SusWrite 430
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 26.4
111% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 40.5
94% 188 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 100%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
238GB free
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 946 923 927 932 352 254 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,284
Write 1,023
Mixed 987
SusWrite 722
225% 1,004 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 58.1
190% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 430
317% 418 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 173%
Great: 271%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
115GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 76 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 73
Write 77.5
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 76
58% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$44
472GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 90
Mixed 101
SusWrite 103
74% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
415GB free
Firmware: JEDOA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 83 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 86.5
Write 83.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 83.2
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 51%
WD Blue SSHD 1TB (2015)-$22
832GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 102 104 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 53.2
Write 102
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 98.9
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 60%
ASMT 2105 1TB
540GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 139 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 184
Write 142
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 140
166% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.4
257% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2A2400C16 CMK32GX4M2A2400C14 CMK32GX4M2A2400C16 CMK32GX4M2A2400C14 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 24.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 25
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback