Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus G11CD-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '19 at 17:39
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	55%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Memory 81.9 1-Core 120 2-Core 221 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 647 65% 526 Pts	64-Core 678 42% 678 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 872C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (58 fps cap detected)	46.6% Average	Lighting 57.2 Reflection 59.5 Parallax 51.1 47% 55.9 fps	MRender 57.6 Gravity 54.4 Splatting 57.7 46% 56.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 148 147 151 150 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 414 Write 397 Mixed 162 SusWrite 148 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 15.1 64% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 78.1 DQ Write 77.8 DQ Mixed 75 57% 77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 478GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 162 150 168 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 145 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 160 94% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB 20,415 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	73.2% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 21.7 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 23.7 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	922x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	735x
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	458x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	298x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	241x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	146x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	141x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	115x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	173x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	163x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $171

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16