Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 13:43
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 126
61% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 418
39% 327 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
PNY(196E 11A1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 124
Parallax 114
91% 117 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 116
Splatting 94.9
84% 104 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 89%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$50
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 196 198 206 199 201 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 477
Write 318
Mixed 192
SusWrite 203
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 41.4
141% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 212
173% 246 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 105%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
74GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 359 98 30 44 120 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Average
Read 206
Write 157
Mixed 127
SusWrite 164
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 16.4
66% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 34.6
DQ Write 44.2
DQ Mixed 38.8
29% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40%
Great: 100%
WD Elements 1TB
128GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 29.8
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 28.9
38% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 24
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 20.1
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 15.6
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback