Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 11 '19 at 05:55
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 186
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 568
56% 456 Pts
64-Core 787
49% 787 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 7.5
6% 12.7 fps
MRender 9.05
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 14.9
9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
671GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 93 110 136 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 108
Write 70.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 107
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback