Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE PRO U200 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	2.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070604
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '19 at 22:44
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T7400 12 User benchmarks, average bench 30% uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Memory 29.1 1-Core 10.6 2-Core 21.2 14% 20.3 Pts	4-Core 21.6 8-Core 21.6 3% 21.6 Pts	64-Core 21.8 1% 21.8 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 38%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHY2160BH 160GB-$45 1,038 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0081000D SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 36 37 32 35 39 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 42.5 Write 30.9 Mixed 29 SusWrite 35 25% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	5.35% Terrible	MC Read 1.6 MC Write 1.5 MC Mixed 1.6 4% 1.57 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 1.6 4% 1.4 GB/s	Latency 260 15% 260 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 5.35% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16