Asrock A75M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A75M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121119
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 17:59
Run Duration345 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3500 APU-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 65.4
40% 57.6 Pts
4-Core 93
8-Core 92.5
12% 92.8 Pts
64-Core 98.7
6% 98.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
ASRock(1849 9640) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
2.51% Terrible
Lighting 2.87
Reflection 3.81
Parallax 2.28
2% 2.99 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.36 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.51%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 230 244 262 254 270 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 455
Write 373
Mixed 338
SusWrite 252
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 37.7
123% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 155
126% 177 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 118%
JMicron 120GB
14GB free
Firmware: 4102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 43 43 41 43 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31% Below average
Read 271
Write 137
Mixed 122
SusWrite 43.6
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 10.2
50% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 62.5
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 31.9
32% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31%
Great: 62%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
67GB free
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 56 58 57 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 49
Write 47.9
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 56.4
34% 45.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 59%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
280GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 40 42 41 43 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 69
Write 84.2
Mixed 72
SusWrite 41.2
50% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
190% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32%
Great: 90%
Asmt 2115 500GB
167GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 41 39 42 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 71.7
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 40
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 67%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
1TB free, PID 2756
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 117 126 125 128 131 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
Read 145
Write 138
Mixed 38
SusWrite 122
144% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.2 MB/s
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
236GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 40 37 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 90
Write 95
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 38.9
77% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
13GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 18.2
Write 11.9
Mixed 14
SusWrite 3.9
15% 12 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.4
157% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10%
Great: 13%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 128GB
101GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 14 11 14 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 20.4
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 12.3
26% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.3
126% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.8% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 94
43% 94 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $407
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback