ADD TO PC
BUILD

ASUS Celtic i3-4160A

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	ASUS Celtic i3-4160A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H81M-E
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180326
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '19 at 16:52
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Memory 92.4 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 239 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 437 8-Core 603 66% 520 Pts	64-Core 606 38% 606 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.8% Average	Lighting 63.4 Reflection 58.9 Parallax 75 52% 65.8 fps	MRender 61.9 Gravity 59.9 Splatting 50.4 46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB 5,433 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM71.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 39 75 40 48 49 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 303 Write 103 Mixed 126 SusWrite 89.2 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 22.9 103% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 140 120% 172 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 97%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25 5,893 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01KF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 151 150 152 151 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 158 Write 143 Mixed 95.2 SusWrite 150 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	59.9% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 17.4 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 20.3 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback