Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '19 at 06:45
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3450 3,425 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 97.7 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 195 77% 130 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 486 56% 437 Pts	64-Core 486 30% 486 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 373A) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (100^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)	58.8% Above average	Lighting 72.8 Reflection 71.4 Parallax 61.4 59% 68.5 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 69 Splatting 71.4 58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Y6-120G 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02T130S4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 85 2.5 28 55 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 28% Great: 66%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 99GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 91 3.6 29 56 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 102 Write 98.2 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 51.5 51% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 103%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$49 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 55GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 69 69 69 69 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 71.3 Write 70.2 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 68.5 46% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 17.1 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 15.2 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 47.2 85% 47.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	94x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	71x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	161x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	119x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16