Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '19 at 22:00
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 165
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 474
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2175 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.6% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 25
22% 27.5 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 34.8
27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 247 257 227 241 262 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 333
Mixed 436
SusWrite 249
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 48.7
160% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 62.3
94% 179 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 129%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
34GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 75 73 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 397
Write 74.5
Mixed 128
SusWrite 74.2
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 33.2
123% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 77.4
DQ Mixed 93.1
70% 94.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 69%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 209 201 202 204 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 184
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 203
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
199% 2 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.1% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 19.2
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 14.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback