Asus M4A87TD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '19 at 07:04
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 94.5
45% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 186
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Asus(1043 0356) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.33% Terrible
Lighting 7.73
Reflection 8.85
Parallax 6.84
6% 7.81 fps
MRender 8.33
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 68 74 71 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 121
Write 98.8
Mixed 107
SusWrite 71.5
22% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 21.8
86% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 83.6
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 85.1
63% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
212GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 65 62 61 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 103
Write 91.4
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 63.4
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
396GB free
Firmware: JB0O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 106 108 109 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 117
Write 84.4
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 106
60% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-173.A00LF 9905402-413.A00LF 9905402-413.A00LF 9905403-173.A00LF 8GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 12.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback