TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel_ DG45ID__

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemINTEL_ DG45ID__
MotherboardIntel_ DG45ID__  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 17:30
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 73.8
41% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 154
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 49%
 Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.34 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.71 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.1%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 68 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 87.4
Write 80.1
Mixed 52
SusWrite 68.4
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 44.8%
 Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
767GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 101
Write 110
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 69
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 48.7%
 Great: 58%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
280GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 96 96 96 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 61.7
Write 65.2
Mixed 40
SusWrite 96.9
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 45.6%
 Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
22.3% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 22.3%
 Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback