Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 04:14
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 830
75% 631 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 123
Parallax 147
110% 135 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 131
Splatting 107
112% 143 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid PCIe SSD 256GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 599 588 598 543 258 247 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 627
Write 492
Mixed 607
SusWrite 472
124% 549 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 30
103% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 262
227% 324 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
58GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,513
Write 1,468
Mixed 1,078
370% 1,687 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 79.1
276% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 923
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 881
667% 894 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
28GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 89 78 90 90 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 513
Write 115
Mixed 378
SusWrite 110
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 39.1
144% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 180
182% 293 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 91%
Adata SU800NS38 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: Q0125D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 176 55 54 54 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 509
Write 418
Mixed 396
SusWrite 137
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 42
146% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 149
140% 208 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 148 148 147 146 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 137
Write 129
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 147
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD BLS16G4D26BFST.16FD BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 29.1
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 26.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback