| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VS (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120910 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 06 '19 at 13:56 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63%
Good
|
63% 103 Pts
|
39% 305 Pts
|
20% 322 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
|
96.6%
Outstanding
|
102% 124 fps
|
86% 105 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 160 190 180 196 207 MB/s
|
47.1%
Average
|
41% 181 MB/s
|
82% 27.5 MB/s
|
31% 46.8 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
41GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 105 97 102 101 MB/s
|
62.3%
Good
|
65% 90.5 MB/s
|
129% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.8%
Below average
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
47% 85 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 377 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 62x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 41x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 54x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $77 |