TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus A88XM-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141205
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJun 05 '19 at 20:42
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 89.7
50% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 89.6
8-Core 93.7
12% 91.6 Pts
64-Core 90.1
6% 90.1 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 46.2%
 Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
Asus(1043 8526) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 4.03
4% 4.32 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 3.27
Splatting 4.78
3% 4.14 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.49%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 120GB-$70
79GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 180 181 180 182 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 446
Write 181
Mixed 233
SusWrite 180
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 34.4
121% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 151
122% 172 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 74.4%
 Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
565GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 156 153 160 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 150
Write 127
Mixed 119
SusWrite 153
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.4
264% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 87.2%
 Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
595GB free, PID b202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 29.8
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 29.9
38% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 16.6%
 Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.4% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.9
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 28.4%
 Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A88XM-A Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A - $62

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD  $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples54x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD  $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples39x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD  $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples38x
GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples31x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples31x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples19x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples14x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples12x
RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples22x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples12x
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 719 samples8x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback