Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '19 at 16:45
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Memory 94.2 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 723 75% 606 Pts	64-Core 748 46% 748 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Lighting 23.2 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 20.3 19% 20.2 fps	MRender 25.4 Gravity 23.6 Splatting 17 18% 22 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N500 240GB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0330A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 259 115 112 66 52 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 492 Write 437 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 170 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 23.3 4K Mixed 2.2 49% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 97 DQ Mixed 42.4 52% 91 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 97%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 429GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 79 79 75 79 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 75.7 Write 74.5 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 78.2 51% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x4GB 7,555 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.4% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	119x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	85x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	50x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	28x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	19x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	17x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $344

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16