Asus VANGUARD B85

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus VANGUARD B85  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150401
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 04 '19 at 14:04
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 193
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 393
50% 381 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 27
Parallax 32.9
28% 31.5 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 34.8
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q0 64GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 85 88 86 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.5% Very good
Read 471
Write 122
Mixed 156
SusWrite 86.6
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 39.4
160% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 107
92% 136 MB/s
Platinet 240 240GB
214GB free
Firmware: 6A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 361 288 292 292 290 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 413
Mixed 382
SusWrite 295
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 57.7
202% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 102
116% 195 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.3 7.9 7.9 7.4 7.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
9.78% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 5.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 7.6
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
69% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.1
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VANGUARD B85 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus VANGUARD B85 - $7,816

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $7,994
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback