Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 17:45
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 870K
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 143
59% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 248
33% 246 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 2GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 26.9
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 38
22% 32 fps
MRender 29.2
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 32.1
24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 169 171 176 198 176 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 218
Write 124
Mixed 140
SusWrite 180
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 20.3
79% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.2
DQ Write 32.2
DQ Mixed 24
19% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 189 191 191 190 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 51.2
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 188
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 15.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 12.1
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback