Pegatron H36FF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPegatron H36FF  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON H36FF
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '16 at 23:24
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 620
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 132
49% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 172
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M
Device(1B0A 209B) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4196
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.66
0% 1.21 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 239
Write 166
Mixed 175
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 8.47
49% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 95.1
DQ Mixed 43
58% 108 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 95%
WD Elements 500GB
37GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 16.5
Mixed 6.96
18% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.13
44% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2N2G64CB8HC5N-BE 830B M2S4G64CB8HB5N-CG 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 9.8
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H36FF Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron H36FF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback