Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55A-UD3  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100810
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 31 '19 at 02:25
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 153
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 239
34% 251 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5830
XFX(1682 3070) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 16.8
15% 15.8 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 14.3
11% 13 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 55 63 66 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 58.5
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 59.6
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
288GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 114 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 63
SusWrite 116
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 69%
WD My Book 1230 2TB
764GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 25.8
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 10.6
30% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 500GB
316GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 25.7
Mixed 22
SusWrite 10.4
28% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 22%
WD My Book 1110 499GB
195GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 24.2
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 10.6
29% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 20%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
2TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 25
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 10.5
29% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55A-UD3 Builds (Compare 520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback