Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 22 '16 at 12:25
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 105
2-Core 194
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 500
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 40.4
39% 44.4 fps
MRender 40.6
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 36.8
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 500
Write 220
Mixed 264
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 17.8
98% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 17.9
23% 40.3 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 116%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
281GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 142
Mixed 137
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.13
63% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 100%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
70GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 75.2
Write 95.9
Mixed 77.7
62% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.19
52% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
14GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 73.3
Write 75.1
Mixed 71.9
55% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.46
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 88%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
4GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 71.8
Write 148
Mixed 99.7
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.16
66% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 86%
WDC WD10 EURX-63FH1Y0 1TB
38GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.9% Below average
Read 94.1
Write 71.9
Mixed 71.5
98% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.14
90% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 36%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
27GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 117
Write 88.2
Mixed 90.2
121% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.24
91% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 50%
WDC WD20 02FYPS-02W3B0 2TB
0GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 25.9
Mixed 28.6
36% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.26
69% 0.77 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-D3H Builds (Compare 1,661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H - $333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback