bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6.18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6.18GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.9 GB free of 6.17969 GB @ 0 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '19 at 10:09
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 132
58% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 135
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.15.1.60
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.38
Parallax 1.19
0% 0.69 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 2
1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 64GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 122 96 107 131 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048, 128, 32, 16, 8 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 0.3
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback