Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 30 '19 at 04:25
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 98.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
92% 162 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 524
60% 470 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.06% Terrible
Lighting 8.33
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 8.38
7% 9.62 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 16.7
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 749 592 598 579 569 565 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,982
Write 898
Mixed 720
SusWrite 609
232% 1,052 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 54.9
218% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 375
340% 534 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 210%
Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
203GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 469 473 473 472 476 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 465
Mixed 385
SusWrite 472
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 49.3
180% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 356
269% 362 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 144 149 149 144 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 150
Write 156
Mixed 74
SusWrite 149
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
4GB free, PID 5406, Cruzer
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.8 6.5 6.7 6.7 6.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
7.25% Terrible
Read 28
Write 3.8
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 6.5
11% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 8%
WDC WD50 00AACS-00G8B1 500GB
198GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 40 41 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.5% Poor
Read 38
Write 37.5
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 40.2
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB-$96
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 31.8
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 34
96% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 45.2
88% 45.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $707
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback