Asrock AB350 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock AB350 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180115
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 29 '19 at 20:30
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 214
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 581
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
PNY(196E 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 65.2
57% 70.1 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 71.1
58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$71
573GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,107
Write 37.7
Mixed 41.2
998% 1,395 MB/s
4K Read 431
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
18,047% 144 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
107GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,322
Write 40
Mixed 70
1,058% 1,477 MB/s
4K Read 446
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.9
18,920% 150 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$21
141GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 62
Write 61.5
Mixed 42.5
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2800C15-4GVR F4-3200C16-4GVK F4-2800C15-4GVR F4-3200C16-4GVK 16GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 34.5
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 28.4
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350 Pro4 - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback