Asrock 990FX Professional

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Professional  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '19 at 21:40
Run Duration409 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 94.6
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 171
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 522
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
CLim: 1151 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66% Good
Lighting 81.3
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 120
66% 88.6 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 89.5
Splatting 82.8
65% 79 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,211
Write 3,361
Mixed 3,426
816% 3,666 MB/s
4K Read 262
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 1.9
523% 165 MB/s
DQ Read 643
DQ Write 557
DQ Mixed 631
464% 610 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate ST310005 24NS 45W 1TB
859GB free
Firmware: BB26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 125 129 127 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 141
Write 117
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 127
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.5% Above average
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 19.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 14.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Professional Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Professional

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback