Lenovo 255545U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 255545U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory13.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130227
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateMay 27 '19 at 15:03
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 192
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 363
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 400
Nvidia(10DE 0893) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.09
2% 2.19 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 1.87
2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 157 167 170 173 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 174
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 162
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Kingston 9905403-558.A00LF Kingston 9905403-558.A00LF 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255545U Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 255545U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback