Asus P9X79-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79-E WS  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '16 at 22:10
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 169
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 608
54% 455 Pts
64-Core 1,170
72% 1,170 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3211) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.7% Below average
Lighting 46
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 61.2
38% 46.3 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 47
Splatting 40
32% 39 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 926
Write 1,462
Mixed 1,137
265% 1,175 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 27.5
99% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.9
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 84.3
67% 89 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 161%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-145.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 37.8
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79-E WS Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus P9X79-E WS - $499

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $969
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback