Performance Results


Gaming 131% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 135% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds)
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 26 '19 at 19:47
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 160 2-Core 295 101% 183 Pts	4-Core 610 8-Core 1,122 104% 866 Pts	64-Core 1,723 107% 1,723 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37C5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 171 Parallax 168 143% 171 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 150 Splatting 113 118% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$39 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1148 533 391 401 404 405 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	266% Outstanding	Read 2,530 Write 2,274 Mixed 1,472 SusWrite 547 380% 1,706 MB/s	4K Read 58.2 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 79.8 270% 96 MB/s	DQ Read 1,010 DQ Write 1,142 DQ Mixed 1,169 855% 1,107 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 266% Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$39 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 78GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,546 Write 2,167 Mixed 1,496 459% 2,070 MB/s	4K Read 64.6 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 85.4 286% 99.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,013 DQ Write 1,312 DQ Mixed 1,162 877% 1,162 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 165 156 163 163 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 163 Mixed 64.3 SusWrite 160 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.2 250% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3466C16 2x16GB 1,361 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.8% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 22.3 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 22.3 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 136%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,328x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,144x
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,086x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,053x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	816x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	687x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	512x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	508x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	470x

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $921

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16