HP EliteBook Folio 9480m

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9480m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 22DA
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140703
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 20 '16 at 17:30
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 105
45% 74 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 140
16% 126 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 22DA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4268
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 4
Parallax 5.66
3% 4.56 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.08 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCC545050A7E380 500GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAC90 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 76
Write 75.3
Mixed 68.4
55% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.13
54% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Sandisk Ultra 126GB
118GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 98.7
Write 66.6
Mixed 54.2
86% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.44
4K Write 0.64
4K Mixed 0.54
53% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 64GB
53GB free, PID dd1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 102
Write 103
Mixed 100
131% 102 MB/s
4K Read 3.68
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 0.68
65% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 9480m Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9480m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback