Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '19 at 22:24
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 115
2-Core 205
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 614
62% 505 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 242
Parallax 258
175% 238 fps
MRender 264
Gravity 222
Splatting 147
166% 211 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 158%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 462
Write 396
Mixed 298
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 52.5
183% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 171
177% 289 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
231GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 271 271 271 272 271 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 298
Mixed 321
SusWrite 290
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 54.9
188% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 231
209% 317 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 111%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
326GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 131 132 132 132 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 143
Write 144
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 131
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 109%
Samsung HD300LJ 300GB-$25
276GB free
Firmware: ZT100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 59 60 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 45.5
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 59.2
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $925
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback