Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 766 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 48.8 1-Core 98 2-Core 176 58% 107 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 771 68% 580 Pts	64-Core 1,952 121% 1,952 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Zotac(19DA 2503) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	137% Outstanding	Lighting 172 Reflection 218 Parallax 235 140% 208 fps	MRender 257 Gravity 214 Splatting 137 159% 203 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 1TB 2,531 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 612GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 413 401 418 419 412 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 421 Mixed 339 SusWrite 413 93% 412 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 69.1 4K Mixed 29.8 118% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 225 170% 227 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 116%
Kingston SH103S3 480GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 440GB free Firmware: BBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 162 210 212 204 144 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 269 Write 258 Mixed 285 SusWrite 184 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 21 82% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 142 113% 161 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 66%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 138 140 139 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 142 Write 134 Mixed 104 SusWrite 139 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B2G70QH0-CK0 M393B2G70QH0-CK0 Kingston 9965516-424.A00LF 64GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 17.1 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.1 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16