Asus B150M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B150M-C  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160510
Uptime99.9 Days
Run DateMay 25 '19 at 00:26
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 177
74% 123 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 375
52% 383 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 135
Parallax 115
99% 124 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 121
Splatting 98
88% 108 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 40 38 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 49
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 37.1
26% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 17%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
478GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 40
Write 40
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 39.9
51% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.1% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 21.6
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150M-C Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B150M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback