Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110223
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	May 24 '19 at 16:33
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 92.7 2-Core 183 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 338 46% 345 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38% Below average	Lighting 45.8 Reflection 41.9 Parallax 54.8 37% 47.5 fps	MRender 56.1 Gravity 52.8 Splatting 39.2 39% 49.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 200 40 53 64 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 400 Write 345 Mixed 322 SusWrite 95.3 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 2 45% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 28.8 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 1.1 21% 47.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 917GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 168 171 171 169 172 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 164 Mixed 77.8 SusWrite 164 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.3 244% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 109%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB 1,547 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 24GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.7 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	5.48% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 8.2 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 6.2 12% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.6 42% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.48% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair VS2GB1333D3 4x2GB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	49.6% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 15.5 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $185Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	23x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	17x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	16x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	17x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	3x
JM1333KLU-2G 2x2GBTranscendBench 39%, 308 samples	2x
VS2GB1333D4 4x2GBCorsairBench 47%, 334 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $185

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16