Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '19 at 00:07
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	Memory 97.4 1-Core 114 2-Core 268 89% 160 Pts	4-Core 544 8-Core 860 86% 702 Pts	64-Core 1,070 66% 1,070 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.3 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Lighting 67.5 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 96.1 55% 76.8 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 70.1 Splatting 55.2 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,461 Write 1,785 Mixed 1,611 432% 1,952 MB/s	4K Read 65.7 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 89.5 298% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,015 DQ Write 686 DQ Mixed 915 665% 872 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 195GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 296 296 296 297 296 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 487 Mixed 420 SusWrite 316 97% 433 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 62.9 213% 75.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 354 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 124%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 200GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 177GB free, PID 6298 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 37 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 37.7 45% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 3012 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	126% Outstanding	MC Read 49.9 MC Write 48.7 MC Mixed 45.9 138% 48.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 24.5 SC Mixed 25.9 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 48.8 82% 48.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	229x
Core i7-5930KIntel $599Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	41x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	38x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $1,169

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16