Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 19 '16 at 10:32
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 380
53% 393 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 126
Reflection 127
Parallax 108
103% 121 fps
Gravity 103
Splatting 110
95% 107 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 120GB-$75
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 506
Write 187
Mixed 260
70% 318 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 22.1
115% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 43.8
70% 132 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 146
Mixed 151
118% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24.7
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 20.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $401
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback